Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:44 pm
mish has had bad moments with void zones in the pastMethios wrote:I don't get it.Notmish wrote:See, it's not just me.
Page 10 of 113
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:46 pm
Win.
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:07 pm
http://www.atom.com/funny_videos/meth_toy_movies/
If your other childhood toys were made into modern movies.
EDIT: The music is so on point, the Wes Anderson and john Carpenter parts kill me.
If your other childhood toys were made into modern movies.
EDIT: The music is so on point, the Wes Anderson and john Carpenter parts kill me.
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:30 pm
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:43 am
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:21 pm
rofl my friend just showed me that video .. fucking epic ... kid tried to shove a remote up his ass D:
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:33 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-JrYa3u ... re=related
We so need to do this the next time the server fucks us.
We so need to do this the next time the server fucks us.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:03 pm
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:34 am
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:50 am
I like how there's no counterpoint to separation of church and state.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:55 am
Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:43 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MytfhzcSF-Y
Some french dude, I saw some animated gif with this, searched around and found this.
Also has some impressive football skills, check out the related link, put it where you want it.
Some french dude, I saw some animated gif with this, searched around and found this.
Also has some impressive football skills, check out the related link, put it where you want it.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:07 am
"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"
Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 am
using non sequiturs is a good way to be facetiousZeratul wrote:"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"
Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:30 am
Yeah, not like it's in the first amendment or anything...Notmish wrote:Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:21 pm
Rallik wrote:using non sequiturs is a good way to be facetiousZeratul wrote:"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"
Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
Do you wait for me to post then rape whatever I was saying intentionally? If so, keep it up, it entertains me.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:09 pm
Yeah, it isn't....look it up.Rallik wrote:Yeah, not like it's in the first amendment or anything...Notmish wrote:Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
The first amendment contains an anti establishment clause stating that the federal government cannot establish a national religion. It does not state that there need to be a "wall of separation" as has become common in today's nomenclature. That phrase was actually taken from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson and was referencing the need to protect the church from the state, not vice versa.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:33 pm
You're arguing semantics.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
is very clearly a deliberate separation of church and state. Of course it doesn't say, "THURS GONNA BE A WALL BETWEN CHRUCH AND STATE" because laws aren't written with metaphors.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
is very clearly a deliberate separation of church and state. Of course it doesn't say, "THURS GONNA BE A WALL BETWEN CHRUCH AND STATE" because laws aren't written with metaphors.
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:17 am
That's just a blatant misinterpretation of the meaning of separation of church and state. Not having a state religion and not discriminating against or prohibiting the exercise of any religion is the most fundamental requirement for the separation of church and state. To say that the line in the first amendment that prevents the governing body of a religious church from ever having legal power in the secular government of the nation "has nothing to do with the separation of church and state" is absurd. In our time, people take that sort of separation for granted and assume the phrase must mean something more(i.e. governing things like swearing on a bible or saying the word god), when that kind of hollow ritual is completely meaningless.
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:43 am
Interesting I said nothing when I pretty much said what you went on to say in some ways. On the other hand that statement in the Constitution isn't specific about what it means as is most of the Constitution. What the Constitution means is always being questioned but can you really say that it prevents in any real way religion influence in the government. You hollow ritual is largely meaning less but when someone wants to swear in on a Koran its a big deal to the political scene.