I Found It On The Web...

DON'T REGISTER. WE DON'T USE THESE FORUMS ANYMORE.

Moderator: Officer

Melbu
King of the Winglies
Posts: 5649
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:52 pm
Location: I am somewhere where I don't know where I am
Contact:

Post by Melbu » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:44 pm

Methios wrote:
Notmish wrote:
Methios wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvVfbqnWodI

FUCKING IMMACULATE!
See, it's not just me.
I don't get it.
mish has had bad moments with void zones in the past
Methios
Grand Casual
Posts: 1657
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:40 am
Location: Iowa
Contact:

Post by Methios » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:46 pm

Win.
Facts
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:53 pm
Contact:

Post by Facts » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:07 pm

http://www.atom.com/funny_videos/meth_toy_movies/

If your other childhood toys were made into modern movies.



EDIT: The music is so on point, the Wes Anderson and john Carpenter parts kill me.
Datta. Dayadvham. Damyata. Shantih Shantih Shantih.
Barrin
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:05 pm
Contact:

Post by Barrin » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:30 pm

Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a few hours. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for life.
[profile]Bàrrin[/profile]
User avatar
cptn
Push Dem Buttons
Posts: 913
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:33 am
Location: Chi City
Contact:

Post by cptn » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:43 am

Tassadar
Posts: 684
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:28 pm
Location: Palins couch
Contact:

Post by Tassadar » Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:21 pm

rofl my friend just showed me that video .. fucking epic ... kid tried to shove a remote up his ass D:
Image
Palin wrote:but he leaves a really bad taste in my mouth
Shearokal (8:36:38 PM): das right, cause we niggas gotta stick together
Hirokal : NOOOOOO! I love Tass :(
Notmish
Posts: 1705
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:02 pm
Contact:

Post by Notmish » Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:33 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-JrYa3u ... re=related

We so need to do this the next time the server fucks us.
Image
Tassadar
Posts: 684
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:28 pm
Location: Palins couch
Contact:

Post by Tassadar » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:03 pm

http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2008/02/3-year-old-expl/

star wars explained by a 3 year old
Image
Palin wrote:but he leaves a really bad taste in my mouth
Shearokal (8:36:38 PM): das right, cause we niggas gotta stick together
Hirokal : NOOOOOO! I love Tass :(
Facts
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:53 pm
Contact:

Post by Facts » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:34 am

Image
Datta. Dayadvham. Damyata. Shantih Shantih Shantih.
User avatar
Palin
The Professor
Posts: 16604
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:16 pm
Contact:

Post by Palin » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:50 am

I like how there's no counterpoint to separation of church and state.
Notmish
Posts: 1705
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:02 pm
Contact:

Post by Notmish » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:55 am

Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
Image
qourthon
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:32 am
Contact:

Post by qourthon » Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:43 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MytfhzcSF-Y

Some french dude, I saw some animated gif with this, searched around and found this.
Also has some impressive football skills, check out the related link, put it where you want it.
Zeratul
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:40 am
Contact:

Post by Zeratul » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:07 am

"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"

Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
ImageImage
Rallik
Website Dude
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:20 am
Contact:

Post by Rallik » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 am

Zeratul wrote:"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"

Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
using non sequiturs is a good way to be facetious
Rallik
Website Dude
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:20 am
Contact:

Post by Rallik » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:30 am

Notmish wrote:Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
Yeah, not like it's in the first amendment or anything...
Zeratul
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:40 am
Contact:

Post by Zeratul » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:21 pm

Rallik wrote:
Zeratul wrote:"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"

Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
using non sequiturs is a good way to be facetious

Do you wait for me to post then rape whatever I was saying intentionally? If so, keep it up, it entertains me.
ImageImage
Notmish
Posts: 1705
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:02 pm
Contact:

Post by Notmish » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:09 pm

Rallik wrote:
Notmish wrote:Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
Yeah, not like it's in the first amendment or anything...
Yeah, it isn't....look it up.

The first amendment contains an anti establishment clause stating that the federal government cannot establish a national religion. It does not state that there need to be a "wall of separation" as has become common in today's nomenclature. That phrase was actually taken from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson and was referencing the need to protect the church from the state, not vice versa.
Image
Rallik
Website Dude
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:20 am
Contact:

Post by Rallik » Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:33 pm

You're arguing semantics.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

is very clearly a deliberate separation of church and state. Of course it doesn't say, "THURS GONNA BE A WALL BETWEN CHRUCH AND STATE" because laws aren't written with metaphors.
Rallik
Website Dude
Posts: 771
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:20 am
Contact:

Post by Rallik » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:17 am

That's just a blatant misinterpretation of the meaning of separation of church and state. Not having a state religion and not discriminating against or prohibiting the exercise of any religion is the most fundamental requirement for the separation of church and state. To say that the line in the first amendment that prevents the governing body of a religious church from ever having legal power in the secular government of the nation "has nothing to do with the separation of church and state" is absurd. In our time, people take that sort of separation for granted and assume the phrase must mean something more(i.e. governing things like swearing on a bible or saying the word god), when that kind of hollow ritual is completely meaningless.
Tier
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Bremerton
Contact:

Post by Tier » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:43 am

Interesting I said nothing when I pretty much said what you went on to say in some ways. On the other hand that statement in the Constitution isn't specific about what it means as is most of the Constitution. What the Constitution means is always being questioned but can you really say that it prevents in any real way religion influence in the government. You hollow ritual is largely meaning less but when someone wants to swear in on a Koran its a big deal to the political scene.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests