I Found It On The Web...

Post by **Melbu** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:44 pm

Methios wrote:
Notmish wrote:
Methios wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvVfbqnWodI

FUCKING IMMACULATE!
See, it's not just me.
I don't get it.

mish has had bad moments with void zones in the past

Post by **Methios** » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:46 pm

Post by **Facts** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:07 pm

http://www.atom.com/funny_videos/meth_toy_movies/

If your other childhood toys were made into modern movies.

EDIT: The music is so on point, the Wes Anderson and john Carpenter parts kill me.

Post by **Barrin** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:30 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj-x9ygQEGA

Post by **cptn** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:43 am

she stopped paying!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YersIyzsOpc&fmt=18

Post by **Tassadar** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:21 pm

rofl my friend just showed me that video .. fucking epic ... kid tried to shove a remote up his ass D:

Post by **Notmish** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:33 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-JrYa3u ... re=related

We so need to do this the next time the server fucks us.

Post by **Tassadar** » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:03 pm

http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2008/02/3-year-old-expl/

star wars explained by a 3 year old

Post by **Facts** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:34 am

Post by **Palin** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:50 am

I like how there's no counterpoint to separation of church and state.

Post by **Notmish** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:55 am

Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.

Post by **qourthon** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:43 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MytfhzcSF-Y

Some french dude, I saw some animated gif with this, searched around and found this.
Also has some impressive football skills, check out the related link, put it where you want it.

Post by **Zeratul** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:07 am

"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"

Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard

Post by **Rallik** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 am

Zeratul wrote:"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"

Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard

using non sequiturs is a good way to be facetious

Post by **Rallik** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:30 am

Notmish wrote:Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.

Yeah, not like it's in the first amendment or anything...

Post by **Zeratul** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:21 pm

Rallik wrote:
Zeratul wrote:"What's "Non Sequitur?" mean? Do I look it up in a Fag-to-English Dictionary?"

Terrible time be be taking a drink, almost drown at my desk I lol'ed so hard
using non sequiturs is a good way to be facetious

Do you wait for me to post then rape whatever I was saying intentionally? If so, keep it up, it entertains me.

Post by **Notmish** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:09 pm

Rallik wrote:
Notmish wrote:Except that separation of church and state is a mythical concept that cannot be found in and legal text whatsoever.
Yeah, not like it's in the first amendment or anything...

Yeah, it isn't....look it up.

The first amendment contains an anti establishment clause stating that the federal government cannot establish a national religion. It does not state that there need to be a "wall of separation" as has become common in today's nomenclature. That phrase was actually taken from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson and was referencing the need to protect the church from the state, not vice versa.

Post by **Rallik** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:33 pm

You're arguing semantics.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

is very clearly a deliberate separation of church and state. Of course it doesn't say, "THURS GONNA BE A WALL BETWEN CHRUCH AND STATE" because laws aren't written with metaphors.

Post by **Rallik** » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:17 am

That's just a blatant misinterpretation of the meaning of separation of church and state. Not having a state religion and not discriminating against or prohibiting the exercise of any religion is the most fundamental requirement for the separation of church and state. To say that the line in the first amendment that prevents the governing body of a religious church from ever having legal power in the secular government of the nation "has nothing to do with the separation of church and state" is absurd. In our time, people take that sort of separation for granted and assume the phrase must mean something more(i.e. governing things like swearing on a bible or saying the word god), when that kind of hollow ritual is completely meaningless.

Post by **Tier** » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:43 am

Interesting I said nothing when I pretty much said what you went on to say in some ways. On the other hand that statement in the Constitution isn't specific about what it means as is most of the Constitution. What the Constitution means is always being questioned but can you really say that it prevents in any real way religion influence in the government. You hollow ritual is largely meaning less but when someone wants to swear in on a Koran its a big deal to the political scene.

I Found It On The Web...

Who is online